This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | ||||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
180 Gasser ?? |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 19513 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 11 Apr 2020 at 5:46am |
||
I have seen a couple that turned the lever around and pointed it forward. Actually worked pretty good.
|
|||
Sponsored Links | |||
shameless dude
Orange Level Joined: 10 Apr 2017 Location: east NE Points: 13611 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
someone before me added height to the PTO lever on my XT, made it a lot better than the way it was before.
|
|||
Lonn
Orange Level Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
190 hydraulic PTO lever could have been a few inches higher but it sure beats the very early 190 manual rod with a knob that sat flat on the floor under the left side of the seat. That was a terrible idea.
|
|||
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|||
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: South West Mich Points: 5391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Sadly, the PTO placement on the 190 (hydraulic activation) leaves a little to be desired |
|||
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: South West Mich Points: 5391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Not on mine either . thanks for your info Tbone and Happy Easter !!
|
|||
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: South West Mich Points: 5391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
,to me, the left-of-seat hydraulic lever set-up was just BASS-AKWARD for a right hand operator . The throttle, P/D lever and the "natural" reflex to look over the right shoulder(to me anyhow) made for VERY long tillage days . Seems like there was a hydraulic lever set-up on an off-colored tractor situated on the "hump" between the seat and steering column ?? I've been on Olivers, 30 series Cases, Fergusons, Massey's, I/H's , blue Fords, and sadly JD's . I've eve run a Case RC with a true hand clutch LOL !!
|
|||
Tbone95
Orange Level Access Joined: 31 Aug 2012 Location: Michigan Points: 11388 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
We had a Massey Ferguson 165, I think a 1968. Whatever year it was, it was 1 model year prior to live PTO according to Dad. PTO was a short lever on the left hand side way to the rear. As a young one, you really had to reach for it. I guess not being live, you had to be stopped pretty much to engage it anyway, so not seeing where you were going wasn't much of an issue. Funny by contrast, and all the slamming Deere usually takes, our JD 630 had a foot pedal PTO engagement, actually worked pretty nice for a 1958!
|
|||
Tbone95
Orange Level Access Joined: 31 Aug 2012 Location: Michigan Points: 11388 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
MACK
Orange Level Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Points: 7664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Talk about unhandy, some IH had PTO lever directly behind operator. MACK
|
|||
Lonn
Orange Level Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I hope lock down fever hasn't got you two bent out of shape
|
|||
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|||
Tbone95
Orange Level Access Joined: 31 Aug 2012 Location: Michigan Points: 11388 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Last one available isn’t the same thing as when the popularity of diesel and demise of gas began. No surprise, sorry. |
|||
Lonn
Orange Level Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I was wrong, the hydraulic levers are to the right of the steering wheel on a 560. D19 wins hands down for hydraulic lever placement.
|
|||
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|||
Lonn
Orange Level Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If I remember right the 560 was at the right and slightly to the rear of the seat while the D19 was just on the left side of the seat. I always liked running my D19 because it was quiet, had a long wheelbase for a gentle ride and it had two way hydraulics vs the old D17. The D19 would walk through mud better than Dad's 190XT even with the narrow 7.50x16 fronts vs the XT with 10.00x16 fronts.
|
|||
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|||
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: South West Mich Points: 5391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I also ran a 560 IH for a neighbor, but for the life of me, I can't recall the hydraulic lever layout . I DO recall the '19's configuration .
|
|||
Lonn
Orange Level Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Growing up running the D series I never gave the control positions much thought. Beat the neighbor's 560 to pieces IMO............. Looks like I'll always go to bat for AC!
|
|||
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|||
Lonn
Orange Level Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I would never say I hated a 180 because of the control layout. Yes a 190 or 200 is better but the 180 is no worse than a 3020, 4020, 656, 1650, M670, 5000 etc. They all have levers in all directions and some in harder to reach spots. In my biased book the 180 wins.
Edited by Lonn - 09 Apr 2020 at 7:35pm |
|||
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|||
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: South West Mich Points: 5391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Your buddy would've completely freaked out running a D-19 , talk about "all- over- the-place" controls
|
|||
ac fleet
Orange Level Joined: 12 Jan 2014 Location: Arrowsmith, ILL Points: 2204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
My buddy sold his 180 gas a couple years ago----he despised it---controls were all over and you had to reach for everything on them---nuttin handy bout them. He took the money from the 180 and put it on a 200 ,--- so now he has the 200, a 190 xtd, and a 190 gas. He loves the controls on them. I always found the 190's a better tractor to drive.
|
|||
http://machinebuildersnetwork.com/
|
|||
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: South West Mich Points: 5391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Thanks Lonn
|
|||
Lonn
Orange Level Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I'd guess for the 180 1973 and I'm pretty sure for all Allis Chalmers farm tractors, the 175 in 1976.
|
|||
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|||
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: South West Mich Points: 5391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
, any idea of when/model of the LAST gas engine was offered?? You might surprise me by your answer .
|
|||
Tbone95
Orange Level Access Joined: 31 Aug 2012 Location: Michigan Points: 11388 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I don't see why that should be surprising. Just look at the history of farm tractors and the time frame you're talking about.
|
|||
Gary Burnett
Orange Level Access Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: Virginia Points: 2852 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I had both at the same time the 190XT burned a whole lot more gas than the 180,of course the 190XT had a whole lot more power.
|
|||
Carl(NWWI)
Orange Level Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: NW WI Points: 948 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
265 cylinder parts are NLA. Rings are the only thing available.
Rebuilding a 301 gas right now. Reliance and Mahle/Clevite have most the parts Available. |
|||
MACK
Orange Level Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Points: 7664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
A 190xt gas would not use any more gas than a D19 gas. MACK
|
|||
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 19513 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Only an early model "G" Gleaner ever used a G-301 gas engine and a G-265 was never in any Gleaner.
|
|||
DougG
Orange Level Joined: 20 Sep 2009 Location: Mo Points: 7946 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Got a 190 gasser and it sounds just like an ole Gleaner engine ,, works great tho,,
|
|||
DrAllis
Orange Level Access Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 19513 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
180 and 190 were 265 cubic inches. 180 had a smaller carburetor than a 190. 190XT was 301 cubes and had a larger carb than a 190.
|
|||
Lonn
Orange Level Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29773 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
No
|
|||
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|||
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access Joined: 15 Apr 2017 Location: South West Mich Points: 5391 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I was just surprised by the 10-1 ratio . Were there any 185 gassers produced ?
|
|||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |