This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity.
The Forum Parts and Services Unofficial Allis Store Tractor Shows Serial Numbers History
Forum Home Forum Home > Allis Chalmers > Farm Equipment
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


F2 or F3 capacity

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
GWS View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 13 Nov 2012
Location: Central NY
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GWS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: F2 or F3 capacity
    Posted: 16 Apr 2013 at 7:01pm
I've got a JD 4400 combine that does an excellent job, but is very slow in heavy corn (over 200 bu.). I end up in 1st gear and get a little trash in the bin. I need to  speed things up. Would an F2 or F3 have any more capacity?  
Also, prices for a good L seem close to a good F3.  Maybe the answer is a 4 row head on an L, or is that overkill on capacity?
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
DrAllis View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Points: 21725
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DrAllis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Apr 2013 at 8:11pm
F2-F3 in corn not much (if any) bigger than a 4400-4420 Deere. A model "L" is older 1972 thru 1976 and more like a 7700 Deere.
Back to Top
GM Guy View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Location: NW KS / S.C. ID
Points: 1985
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GM Guy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Apr 2013 at 8:34pm
My old man says it would be a close match, but figures the Gleaner would have the edge with the 2 stage cleaning, and the overall balance of the machine and being super easy to work on verus the JD, combined with that efficient and powerful 433I engine would just make for a joy of a machine compared to that overweight underpowered 4400.
 
As far as more capacity, while still being rather nimble, we seem to like the M series. in super heavy small grains, taking in over a foot of stubble for baling, the M series is a little narrow, but for corn we find they are plenty capable, and the open grate concave really shines. We last used one when it was wet, and we had corn, and that late M with the 6R30 black and 23.1x30 tires was just fun in the mud, and could be pushed pretty fast in our 120 bushel dryland crop.
 
in 78 and newer, a M2 or M3 has a factory 180 bushel bin, and can take 4 rows, so quite the punch through capability in a pivot of corn, no need to jockey around and knock over corn, just go right on through!
 
 
no matter what you choose, I would vote to get a hydro, no variable speed to slop out, and infinite speeds. IMO a little better in mud.
 
 
 
Gleaner: the properly engineered and built combine.

If you need parts for your Gleaner, we are parting out A's through L2's, so we may be able to help.
Back to Top
n7gleaner View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 30 Jun 2012
Location: Iowa
Points: 181
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote n7gleaner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Apr 2013 at 8:47pm
Here is a quick comparison between a John deere and Gleaner 

1. 4400 or 4420 pretty much the same as a F(long back) or f2 or f3

2. 6600 or 6620 pretty much the same as M or M2 or M3

3. 7700 or 7720 pretty much the same as L or L2 or L3

4. 8820 JD larger combine then the L series from gleaner but many will say an L gleaner can keep up to a 8820 JD. As long as the L has the 426CI engine in it.
Back to Top
GWS View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 13 Nov 2012
Location: Central NY
Points: 269
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GWS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Apr 2013 at 6:20am
Thanks for the input guys. I know what you mean about Gleaners' being easy to work on. I had a little K for years and didnt appreciate how easy it was to work on til I got the 4400. Now I need to change the unloading auger drive belt and even that looks like a nasty job! If we put the proper value on our time, it makes Gleaners worth that much more, doesn't it.
Leaning towards trading for an M this fall. Seen a couple hillside models on TractorHouse. Does the Gleaner hillside work like the system on a JD6600/6620SH? 
Back to Top
DrAllis View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Points: 21725
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DrAllis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Apr 2013 at 6:37am
Gleaner "hill-side" combine is a model "MH" and a corn head won't even fit on it. A Gleaner side-hill air blower on the cleaning shoe was a feeble attempt to help on non-flat harvesting conditions. I've got several things you can do to make it work much better and better than a Deere side-hill machine.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.082 seconds.


Help Support the
Unofficial Allis Forum