This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity.
The Forum Parts and Services Unofficial Allis Store Tractor Shows Serial Numbers History
Forum Home Forum Home > Allis Chalmers > Farm Equipment
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Life after the 426

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Charlie175 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Shenandoah, VA
Points: 6369
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Charlie175 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Life after the 426
    Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 10:52am
What was in line for replacing the 426? I think AC knew that it was at the end of it's life but the cost of building a different engine would have been too much. 
Charlie

'48 B, '51 CA, '56 WD45 '61 D17, '63 D12, '65 D10 , '68 One-Ninety XTD
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Lonn View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Location: Назарово,Russia
Points: 29805
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lonn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 11:12am
I think the base 426 frame would have been continuously upgraded or because of costs, replaced entirely by an outsourced power plant. The 426 would be as viable as any other with modern technology IMO.

Edited by Lonn - 12 Apr 2012 at 11:12am
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink
I am a Russian Bot
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 11:12am
There was nothing.  The engine division had been spending its resources on trying to get into the highway truck market.

What would have come after the 426 would have likely been a purchased engine.  In the early 80's, I was having discussions with a number of OEM engine manufacturers including Cummins, Cat, Perkins, and Komatsu.  The 8095/9025 was an attempt to not only develop the next addition to our tractor line, but a chance to see how the Komatsu engine would work and how well it might be accepted by farmers.
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
TexasAllis View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level
Avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Points: 396
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TexasAllis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 12:12pm
Originally posted by 427435 427435 wrote:

There was nothing.  The engine division had been spending its resources on trying to get into the highway truck market.

What would have come after the 426 would have likely been a purchased engine.  In the early 80's, I was having discussions with a number of OEM engine manufacturers including Cummins, Cat, Perkins, and Komatsu.  The 8095/9025 was an attempt to not only develop the next addition to our tractor line, but a chance to see how the Komatsu engine would work and how well it might be accepted by farmers.
 
Makes perfect sense.  There is no volume in ag compared to Trucking.  It's much more cost affective to use someone elses modern diesel and adapt it to an already proven tractor drive train.
1944 Allis C
1960 Allis D-17 LP
Back to Top
injpumpEd View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Walnut IL
Points: 5095
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote injpumpEd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 12:22pm
5.9/8.3L cummins would have made real nice additions to the AC powertrain!
210 "too hot to farm" puller, part of the "insane pumpkin posse". Owner of Guenther Heritage Diesel, specializing in fuel injection systems on heritage era tractors. stock rebuilds to all out pullers!
Back to Top
TexasAllis View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level
Avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Points: 396
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TexasAllis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 12:34pm
Originally posted by injpumpEd injpumpEd wrote:

5.9/8.3L cummins would have made real nice additions to the AC powertrain!
No kidding an awesome combo.  Allis running gear and cummins engines.
1944 Allis C
1960 Allis D-17 LP
Back to Top
Bolivar Boy View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Location: wooster, ohio
Points: 641
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bolivar Boy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 2:41pm
then why did the AC Duetz combination up being a bust ?
Back to Top
BrettPhillips View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Strasburg, VA
Points: 808
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote BrettPhillips Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 2:58pm
Deutz was too arrogant to just use their engines.  They forced their tractors on the US market through AC dealers.  A Deutz engine in an AC tractor might have made for a different story.
Back to Top
richfarmsystem View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Location: Ohio ill
Points: 89
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richfarmsystem Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 3:40pm
seen firsthand what an 8.3 cummins was like in a 4w220. Made a very good combo that was easy on fuel
Back to Top
D-17_Dave View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Mocksville NC
Points: 990
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote D-17_Dave Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 5:40pm
There was nothing easy about the Deutz buyout. They forced onto the US market what they wanted us to have, not what we wanted. Even worse was the crap they forced on us, (air cooled, under powered, vibrating crap), nothing was well accepted. I'm sure there are/were any number of more than fine engines that would have worked but it's almost like they wanted the American part of the company and the market share to fail.
Now where else have we seen something simular...........
Yea, I can fix that.....
Back to Top
DrAllis View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Points: 21851
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DrAllis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 5:54pm
To have been competitive, the "426" needed larger diameter main bearings.....larger diameter rod bearings (which requires an offset connecting rod cap), and another 40 cubic inches at a minimum, an improved cylinder head (that has the air spinning like a pigs tail when it comes out of the intake valve) and HP ratings near 300 flywheel.
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 9:09pm
You could never tell the Krauts anything (and I'm 25% German).  They initially designed an "American" tractor in Independence with the Allis tractor engineers that moved there.  The tractors used a power shift ZF drivetrain and Deutz engines.  As the testing was winding down and production processes were being put together, the costs got rolled up and were way too high. 

West Allis tractor engineering had figured out several years earlier (when sourcing FWA axles) that ZF components weren't affordable, but the Krauts weren't interested in listening.  And the AC executives and engineers didn't want to rile up their bosses anyway-----------they just wanted to hang on for a few more years and retire.

So no product was left (West Allis had been closed and the 8000 inventory was gone), so they had to import the German Deutz which didn't fit most of the North American's needs.

Just a Deutz air-cooled history in an orange 8000's Series would have been a big enough marketing job, but possible.  Especially with a 3-speed range shift and an 8095/9025 topping the line.  The 3 speed range would have put the middle range from about 3.5 mph to 10+ mph.  This would have allowed an operator to choose the middle range for virtually all field operations and never have to make a range shift except getting on or off the highway.

Oh well, just crying over spilled-milk.
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 9:16pm
Originally posted by DrAllis DrAllis wrote:

To have been competitive, the "426" needed larger diameter main bearings.....larger diameter rod bearings (which requires an offset connecting rod cap), and another 40 cubic inches at a minimum, an improved cylinder head (that has the air spinning like a pigs tail when it comes out of the intake valve) and HP ratings near 300 flywheel.


That all would have required lots tooling and there was no money or volume to justify it.  Cummins was really foaming at the mouth trying to get the business in the early 80's. 

However, the bankers were calling the shots.  They wanted the farm equipment business sold off and some of their loans paid off.  They didn't want to invest any more money in the business.  Allis needed to develop a plan to get rid of the Harvey Engine Works in the early 70's when they had some money and time to maneuver.  Cummins was looking for customers/partners for their B and C engines then already.  However, that would have been a big write-down of assets and a big P/L hit----------which would have cost Scott and some of the execs their bonus checks.
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
Carl(NWWI) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: NW WI
Points: 954
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Carl(NWWI) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 9:30pm
I believe swinfords book had the 8095 with a 673 kamatsu in it? That would have been interesting to see.
Back to Top
Dave in il View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Location: Manville Il
Points: 1748
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dave in il Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 9:34pm
Don't forget their "cost efficient" replacement for the too expensive new tractor design was to have Allied shove the Deuts engines into the outdated White chassis and cab. So they offered a tractor that the majority of farmers didn't want when White sold them, with an engine most farmers didn't want either, and to top it off they painted them that awful shade of green. Who would have guessed it would be an epic failure? LOL
AGCO My Allis Gleaner Company
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 9:57pm
Originally posted by Dave in il Dave in il wrote:

Don't forget their "cost efficient" replacement for the too expensive new tractor design was to have Allied shove the Deuts engines into the outdated White chassis and cab. So they offered a tractor that the majority of farmers didn't want when White sold them, with an engine most farmers didn't want either, and to top it off they painted them that awful shade of green. Who would have guessed it would be an epic failure? LOL


Exactly!!
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 10:07pm
Calling the 225 hp tractor with a Komatsu engine an 8095 made no sense, but that is what Swinford has called it.  The 6000 Series were tractors under 100 hp with the last 2 digits the approximate pto hp.  The 8000 Series were tractors between 100 and 199 hp----again with the last 2 digits being the approximate pto hp minus the first 100 hp.  The tractor below should/would have been called a 9025----a "conventional" tractor of 200 hp and over with the last 2 digits being the pto hp minus 200.







By the way, at 225 hp, the engine was under rated------it had a heck of a torque rise with well over 225 hp when lugged down.  It was fun to drive in the field------made the 4w-220 look sick.

Those are also (new at the time) 20.8-42 tires on the rear.



Edited by 427435 - 12 Apr 2012 at 10:16pm
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 10:10pm
Originally posted by Carl(NWWI) Carl(NWWI) wrote:

I believe swinfords book had the 8095 with a 673 kamatsu in it? That would have been interesting to see.


Actually, the engine was at 643 cu. in. at the time.
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
Carl(NWWI) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: NW WI
Points: 954
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Carl(NWWI) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 10:29pm
So did they have any with the 673 in it or were they never going to use it?
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 10:47pm
Originally posted by Carl(NWWI) Carl(NWWI) wrote:

So did they have any with the 673 in it or were they never going to use it?


I think the 673 is a later engine----perhaps an enlarged 643.  It might also be a totally different engine as a lot has happened since the 80's.
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
ILGLEANER View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Willow Hill,ILL
Points: 6448
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ILGLEANER Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 10:57pm
Mark .It dont take much to make a 4w220 look sick in the field.....LOL I have one. There a nice tractor to drive. But they aint much for power. Absolutley no bottom end, lugging power.  And since we are talking about the 8000 series. I love to hear you talk about them,You know more about them then anyone. Why didnt they have a foot throttle? And why was the throtle clear up in the front dash in the 82's. The throtle is actually worse then the 7000 series.
                                                     IG
Education doesn't make you smart, it makes you educated.
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 11:21pm
Originally posted by ILGLEANER ILGLEANER wrote:

Mark .It dont take much to make a 4w220 look sick in the field.....LOL I have one. There a nice tractor to drive. But they aint much for power. Absolutley no bottom end, lugging power.  And since we are talking about the 8000 series. I love to hear you talk about them,You know more about them then anyone. Why didnt they have a foot throttle? And why was the throtle clear up in the front dash in the 82's. The throtle is actually worse then the 7000 series.
                                                     IG


The foot throttle wasn't on the list of things marketing was willing to pay for. 

I'm to blame for the throttle on the dash.  I wanted the throttle in a position that that was the only thing you would find if reaching for it in a hurry (emergency).  Putting it on the side console, I felt, was going to make things too crowded.




Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
ILGLEANER View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Willow Hill,ILL
Points: 6448
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ILGLEANER Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2012 at 11:45pm
You for sure got it up away from everything. But its hard to put the implement down, give it the throttle,and steer. All at the same time. If you put the implement down before the throttle, it will kill the engine. That is where the foot throttle was nice on the 7000 you could do both at the same time.
                                                  IG
 
Education doesn't make you smart, it makes you educated.
Back to Top
b170dr View Drop Down
Bronze Level
Bronze Level
Avatar

Joined: 05 Feb 2012
Location: Gays Mills Wi
Points: 46
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote b170dr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2012 at 12:01am
The consol on the 190 series was the best set up of all.  :Everything at your  finger tips.   The latter seeries is just a mess.  I have them, I know.
'64 B-10, '58 D-14, '60 D-15D, '58 D-17D, D-19, 170, 2-185D, 190, 68 D-21 11, 72-220, 7000,7030, F-2 G,w/5 Heads,L-2 G, 330 No-Till
Back to Top
Kevin in WA View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 08 Feb 2010
Location: Lynden, WA
Points: 612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kevin in WA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2012 at 12:19am
The 426 should have gotten larger rod and mains in 1973, along with an inline injection pump, and a larger head like Dr. Allis said. Did they actually think that the 426 was going to be reliable in the 7080 and 7580?
Back to Top
Burgie View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Scottsburg, IN
Points: 1192
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Burgie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2012 at 5:21am
427435 The engine (Komatsu) is in the Hunley 8095 and we are finishing it up. That sure does sound SWEET.
"Burgie"
Back to Top
Jordan(OH) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Celina, OH
Points: 1563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jordan(OH) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2012 at 8:45am
Burgie, does it have the 3 speed range?
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2012 at 8:49am
Originally posted by Kevin in WA Kevin in WA wrote:

The 426 should have gotten larger rod and mains in 1973, along with an inline injection pump, and a larger head like Dr. Allis said. Did they actually think that the 426 was going to be reliable in the 7080 and 7580?


I rejoined AC in 1977 after leaving them in 1969 when they closed the La Crosse plant (I wasn't interested in moving to LaPorte), so I don't know what "they" thought when the 7080 or 7580 were brought out.  By the late 70's, the warranty and field reports were not good----------thus the re-rating and rpm reductions of the 8070 and 4w-220.
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
427435 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: SE Minnesota
Points: 18637
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 427435 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2012 at 8:51am
Originally posted by Jordan(OH) Jordan(OH) wrote:

Burgie, does it have the 3 speed range?


That never got off the design stage in engineering.  It would have been quite doable with some fairly minor casting and machining changes.
Mark

B10 Allis, 917 Allis, 7116 Simplicity, 7790 Simplicity Diesel,
GTH-L Simplicity

Ignorance is curable-----stupidity is not.
Back to Top
DougG View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Location: Mo
Points: 8339
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DougG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2012 at 3:24pm
Seems like AC always had good ideas just never - built on - or followed thru , it was said the Engine plant was after the big truck market with diesel engines ; why didnt this happen ?? They had the BIG AL in the 70,s , why wasnt that model improved , problems fixed and really shown to be a winner ?? But no it was dropped ; you would have thought a company like ALLIS was back then coulda redigned a whole new engine and actually made money with them instead of playin around and then just forgetting about the project ; this isnt the only thing they invested a ton in and just forgot about , what kinda management was in charge !!???
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.062 seconds.


Help Support the
Unofficial Allis Forum