This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity.
The Forum Parts and Services Unofficial Allis Store Tractor Shows Serial Numbers History
Forum Home Forum Home > Allis Chalmers > Farm Equipment
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Allis chalmers diesels vs the rest..

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Message
Jordan(OH) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Celina, OH
Points: 1559
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jordan(OH) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 3:37pm
Nebraska tests do not equal the real world.  We have a Ford 5640(rated at  68hp), MF 265 (rated 62) and AC 180D (rated 64).  The 180 uses way, way, way, more fuel doing the same jobs as the other two.  
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Lonn View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Location: Назарово,Russia
Points: 29792
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lonn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 3:44pm
Depends on the job and the weight of the tractor. All weights and load the same the 301 is hard to beat for it's day.
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink
I am a Russian Bot
Back to Top
Lonn View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Location: Назарово,Russia
Points: 29792
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lonn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 3:48pm
My FIL, who was a big massey fan and even bigger deere fan, borrowed Dad's XT and was sold completely on the fuel usage and power of the XT and he insisted Dad sell it to him. Dad did and my FIL just loved that tractor. I'll take a good XT up against an 1100 Massey every time.
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink
I am a Russian Bot
Back to Top
Dan73 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Location: United States
Points: 6054
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dan73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 4:42pm
Well I haven't run the 301 diesel but I can tell you the d17 226 gas with just pie weights will way out work any ford or ih of the same hp rating. It will drink the gas doing it but that d17 is the hardest working tractor for its size I have ever seen. I suspect the diesel in the newer tractors are the same.
As much as I hate the gas bill for my d17 I am rebuilding the motor because it just works too hard not to.
Back to Top
AllisandGleaner View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 04 Mar 2016
Location: Sc
Points: 358
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AllisandGleaner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 5:59pm
Dy reading this the 301 has been called a fuel hogger but I always heard they were stingy on fuel but what is true
Back to Top
Dan73 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Location: United States
Points: 6054
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dan73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 6:05pm
Tractor data ac 185



Nebraska Tractor Test 1044:
Test Date:     May 26 - June 3, 1970
Type:     Diesel 8-speed 2WD
PTO power (rated engine speed):     74.87 hp [55.8 kW]
PTO fuel use (engine speed):     5.3 gal/hour [20.1 l/hour]
PTO power (rated PTO speed):     70.72 hp [52.7 kW]
PTO fuel use (PTO speed):     4.9 gal/hour [18.5 l/hour]
Drawbar power (max):     63.82 hp [47.6 kW]
Drawbar fuel use (max):     5.3 gal/hour [20.1 l/hour]
Drawbar pull (max):     7,568 lbs [3432 kg]
Max pull gear:     1-Hi
Test report:     PDF file
Back to Top
DougG View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Location: Mo
Points: 8270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DougG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 Nov 2016 at 6:55pm
Just my opinion here , and have ran many 301 diesels stock and turned up , turboed  and not , none were fuel hogs at all , and ive, plowed, disced, brushogged, cut , raked and baled hay with 180,s , 190,s 190 XT,S , A 7000, and all were not at all fuel hogs, put 10 gallons in a 180 tank you can cut hay till 1, rake some other field till 3 , bale it and still have some left , maybe the other guys had a leak ? Just kidding ! 
Back to Top
JC-WI View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: wisconsin
Points: 34259
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JC-WI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Dec 2016 at 12:35am
Tractor data says 5.3 an hour for a 185... I couldn't put that much through my XT... I didn't run it wide open but in the 1900-2000 rpm range plowing and burned about 3 gallons an hour, doing nearly the same amount as the neighbor who said his 966 was burning 7 gallons an hour.... When we were plowing or discing, it was about 6 cans a day....For each of the XT's... now the 190 gas, less hp., would use about 8 cans  a day... when working hard. and figure about 10 hrs... 
 Want to talk about fuel hogs, Uncle had a 450 IH gas and he was out plowing with it and found out when he went out in the morning after chores, you fueled it up before leaving... come in at dinner, fuel it up, and plow till chore time and then if he did any more tilling after chores, he had to fuel up before going back out, or he would be walking home. LOL  Traded that for a D17 gas and was much happier... then bought an 1800 c series Oliver diesel, much more fuel efficient... Traded his D17 for a 170 Allis with cab and loader... and later traded the 1800 for a White 105. He loved the last two tractors. 105 had air conditioning in it. an the 170 had heat in it for winter.  LOL
He who says there is no evil has already deceived himself
The truth is the truth, sugar coated or not. Trawler II says, "Remember that."
Back to Top
Dan73 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jun 2015
Location: United States
Points: 6054
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dan73 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Dec 2016 at 1:47am
JC that is why I post the tractor data information it looked like a lot of fuel to me but I have only seen a 180 run a baler for a day or two so I had nothing to base it on as the 180 didn't even seem to know that square baler was behind it.
Back to Top
ironac View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level


Joined: 06 Jan 2011
Location: Plainfield IA
Points: 283
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ironac Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Dec 2016 at 4:02am
the 180 only uses .4 more gals an hour then the MF. completely different tractors. id check your air filter. Nebraska tests use actual measurable data. real world has to many variables like engine wear, fuel quality etc....
Back to Top
DrAllis View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Points: 21505
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DrAllis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Dec 2016 at 7:30am
190 XTDiesel 301 turbo was Nebraska test rated at 93.64 HP and only 5.7 Gallons per hr. That, in a way, does make a 185 look kinda bad on fuel useage.
Back to Top
Tbone95 View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Location: Michigan
Points: 12026
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tbone95 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Dec 2016 at 7:38am
Originally posted by nick121 nick121 wrote:

Yeah, In the 7040  usually start in 3 or 4 pulling wagons  And shift it like a semi, dont even use the clutch sometimes.. no grinding if you do it right. 


It's the damage you do while trying to figure out how to do it right that's the problem
Back to Top
Joe(OH) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Montezuma, Ohio
Points: 991
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Joe(OH) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Dec 2016 at 9:03am
Originally posted by Jordan(OH) Jordan(OH) wrote:

Nebraska tests do not equal the real world.  We have a Ford 5640(rated at  68hp), MF 265 (rated 62) and AC 180D (rated 64).  The 180 uses way, way, way, more fuel doing the same jobs as the other two.  

Glad to know that the scientific tested data is not accurate but we have the super calculated measurement of "way,way,way"!  LOL

My 190 XT is super easy on fuel.  7020, uses more.  
Life is simpler when you plow around the stump.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.


Help Support the
Unofficial Allis Forum