This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity.
The Forum Parts and Services Unofficial Allis Store Tractor Shows Serial Numbers History
Forum Home Forum Home > Allis Chalmers > Farm Equipment
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Off-Color - Massey 165 Thoughts?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
wjohn View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2010
Location: KS
Points: 2408
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Off-Color - Massey 165 Thoughts?
    Posted: 21 hours 21 minutes ago at 1:26pm
A friend of a friend has a Massey 165 that I recently asked about since I've noticed it sitting for years. Haven't looked at it in person yet but I have been told it was parked for needing wheels. I figure that could mean rear tires or rims or most likely both. Has a loader on it. Not sure if it's gas or diesel.

In general folks on the internet seem to be saying they are decent tractors, just watch out if the Multipower has issues.

Looks like it will need anywhere between $1200-$3000 depending on if it needs just tires or everything, so it would have to be cheap. Anybody on here have any experience with this model? Looks like there are some parts still available from AGCO and if diesel I presume I could still get Perkins parts.
1939 B, 1940 B, 1941 WC, 1951 WD, 1952 CA, 1956 WD-45
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Tbone95 View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Location: Michigan
Points: 12422
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tbone95 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 hours 45 minutes ago at 2:02pm
One of the very first tractors I drove at age 5. Maybe a little at age 4. So that tells you it’s easy to operate!

We didn’t have the best of luck with ours, but looking back and applying what I’ve learned over the years, I will say we expected too much from it and therefore we were hard on it. We owned it new from 1968-1986.

The one bad thing about them, make sure it has live PTO. The early ones like ours did not. Ours had like a two stage clutch, halfway down was ground transmission, all the way down for PTO. Was a weak poor design and that’s what gave us the most trouble. We never had a problem with the Multi Power. Dad said one year newer than ours had live PTO, though I can’t verify that exactly.

The design seems to make both clutches weak, so regardless of whether you are using it for PTO or not I would recommend live power.

Edited by Tbone95 - 20 hours 25 minutes ago at 2:22pm
Back to Top
thendrix View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 04 Feb 2013
Location: Fairmount GA
Points: 5182
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote thendrix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 hours 38 minutes ago at 3:09pm
I've always been told to avoid a two wheel drive tractor that has a loader due to front end wear. That being said, pawpaw had a MF 235 when I was a kid and he never had a problem that I remember. That tractor was sold to his brother in Mississippi somewhere around 1990 and last I heard it's still there and still working.

Ford also used the 2 stage clutch. I dug post holes with a 3000 one time and I just wasn't a fan of it.
"Farming is a business that makes a Las Vegas craps table look like a regular paycheck" Ronald Reagan
Back to Top
Ed (Ont) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Location: New Lowell, Ont
Points: 1595
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ed (Ont) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 hours 14 minutes ago at 3:33pm
We had a 1974 165 diesel. Was a good tractor. It did not have multi power. I think that was optional.  😀😀
Back to Top
DiyDave View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Gambrills, MD
Points: 55292
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DiyDave Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 hours 13 minutes ago at 3:34pm
IIRR, they also had a differential lock pedal, right heel...
Source: Babylon Bee. Sponsored by BRAWNDO, its got what you need!
Back to Top
Jim.ME View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 19 Nov 2016
Location: Maine
Points: 973
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jim.ME Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 hours 5 minutes ago at 6:42pm
The MF 165 had two possible PTOs, Live or Independent.

Live PTO uses a two-stage clutch.  Traction/transmission clutch disengages about halfway of pedal travel, the PTO disengages and engages in the second half of the pedal travel.  This PTO had ground speed or engine speed options based on control handle position.  That would be the PTO, Tbone95 described.

Independent PTO uses a separate hydraulic clutch to drive it, no need to use the foot clutch.  The PTO shaft is driven by a splined coupling disc built in the pressure plate, so the PTO input shaft is driven all the time the engine is running.  Engine speed only, no ground speed option.
Back to Top
BillinAlberta View Drop Down
Silver Level
Silver Level
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Saskatchewan
Points: 364
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BillinAlberta Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 hours 22 minutes ago at 8:25pm
   We had a 165 with a gas engine (Continental I think)  permanently
hooked to a manure dump wagon when I worked at a large pig farm.The old thing ran in the heat of summer and through many stretches of 40 below.5 miles there and back 3 times a day.
    Multi power took some getting used to and most of us didn't use it so wear wasn't obvious.
     Good tractor .Cheap to run and the heater was great.
Back to Top
tbran View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: Paris Tn
Points: 3664
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tbran Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 hours 16 minutes ago at 8:31pm
if you get it started, make sure the 3 point works first ..... if not familiar with the ferguson system it would take an engineer and instructor a semester to explain the workings and adjustments. The control valve has a 'jiggler' to keep it from sticking if that tell one anything. They sold a bunch of these, no bunches...
When told "it's not the money,it's the principle", remember, it's always the money..
Back to Top
wjohn View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2010
Location: KS
Points: 2408
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wjohn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 hours 12 minutes ago at 9:35pm
Wow, I definitely didn't expect this many guys on the AC forum to have had experience with these. I guess they really were pretty popular.

If it works out, I would mostly be using it for the loader - loading/unloading equipment, moving stuff around, etc. just in intermittent use. Not anything like a lot of dirt or manure work. It might do backup duty on some other small jobs if needed, so if the PTO and 3 point work without much trouble, great... If not, I might not spend too much effort trying to fix them.
1939 B, 1940 B, 1941 WC, 1951 WD, 1952 CA, 1956 WD-45
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.086 seconds.


Help Support the
Unofficial Allis Forum