This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity.
The Forum Parts and Services Unofficial Allis Store Tractor Shows Serial Numbers History
Forum Home Forum Home > Allis Chalmers > Farm Equipment
  New Posts New Posts
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Difference between a 6070 and 6080

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
victoryallis View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Location: Ludington mi
Points: 2878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote victoryallis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Difference between a 6070 and 6080
    Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 12:47pm
What are the physical differences between a 6070 and a 6080? More than the intercooler and hp?

8030 and 8050MFWD, 7580, 3 6080's, 160, 7060, 175, heirloom D17, Deere 8760
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
AC720Man View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Location: Shenandoah, Va
Points: 5148
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AC720Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 1:13pm
The 6070 was an upgrade of the 6060. The transmission was upgraded to the 12 speed fully synchronized transmission found in the 6080 and optional 16.9-34 tires. Power increase to 70 hp. Only 972 were produced.
1968 B-208, 1976 720 (2 of them)Danco brush hog, single bottom plow,52" snow thrower, belly mower,rear tine tiller, rear blade, front blade, 57"sickle bar,1983 917 hydro, 1968 7hp sno-bee, 1968 190XTD
Back to Top
Stan R View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 03 Dec 2009
Location: MA
Points: 973
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Stan R Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 1:51pm
10
Back to Top
4w-220 Butch View Drop Down
Bronze Level
Bronze Level


Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Location: chesterfield NJ
Points: 7
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 4w-220  Butch Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 2:42pm
6080 has heavier wide front end
Back to Top
DrAllis View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access


Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Points: 21448
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DrAllis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 3:09pm
The CLUTCH is smaller on the 6060/6070. Other than that it is the same chassis and maybe rear tires sizes vary, which was the customers choice on those.
Back to Top
littlemarv View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 10 Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Points: 1829
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote littlemarv Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 5:19pm
StanR took my answer.
The mechanic always wins.

B91131, WC23065, WD89101, CA29479, B1, Early B10, HB212, 416H
Back to Top
hillmonkey View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 03 Apr 2010
Location: oville fl
Points: 417
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hillmonkey Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 5:52pm
How was the increase in power obtained from the 6060 to 6070 to 6080?
 CI,turbo,injectors,inj-pump or a combo of those?
Back to Top
AC720Man View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Location: Shenandoah, Va
Points: 5148
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AC720Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 6:02pm
The addition of a Intercooler added the extra hp from what I read. Same 433T engine.
1968 B-208, 1976 720 (2 of them)Danco brush hog, single bottom plow,52" snow thrower, belly mower,rear tine tiller, rear blade, front blade, 57"sickle bar,1983 917 hydro, 1968 7hp sno-bee, 1968 190XTD
Back to Top
Tim (Cent.WI) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Location: Stratford, WI
Points: 214
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tim (Cent.WI) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 6:36pm
From my understanding the 6070 was a 6060 with a 12 speed fully synchronized transmission and they raised the compression to get the extra HP over the 6060. The compression on the 6080 was raised at that time as well but the 6080 was never retested. Alot of people say these later 6080s were pushing 100hp, I have one of the last 6080s but have never had it on a dyno, but it seems to have more than 83hp. The rear end and front end on the 6070 were also a bit lighter than the 6080.
Back to Top
AC7060IL View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Location: central IL
Points: 3498
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AC7060IL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Jan 2018 at 10:12pm
I know the 433 engines were AC. Which other components were foreign & which were Allis Chalmers?
Back to Top
Charlie175 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Shenandoah, VA
Points: 6368
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Charlie175 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 6:28am
Originally posted by AC7060IL AC7060IL wrote:

I know the 433 engines were AC. Which other components were foreign & which were Allis Chalmers?

Transmission back was Fiat Transmission related to their 880 tractor series.
Charlie

'48 B, '51 CA, '56 WD45 '61 D17, '63 D12, '65 D10 , '68 One-Ninety XTD
Back to Top
Charlie175 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Shenandoah, VA
Points: 6368
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Charlie175 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 6:35am
Forgot to add this was done as A-C did not have a "Live" PTO in this HP range. A-C Stuck with the PD way too long as a Live PTO tool IMHO. I think most users preferred using the foot clutch to stop movement rather than the PD neutral. 
Charlie

'48 B, '51 CA, '56 WD45 '61 D17, '63 D12, '65 D10 , '68 One-Ninety XTD
Back to Top
Tim (Cent.WI) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 19 Sep 2009
Location: Stratford, WI
Points: 214
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tim (Cent.WI) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 7:04am
Front axle on the FWA versions was also Fiat
Back to Top
Eldon (WA) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Points: 7765
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Eldon (WA) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 10:40am
Originally posted by Charlie175 Charlie175 wrote:

Forgot to add this was done as A-C did not have a "Live" PTO in this HP range. A-C Stuck with the PD way too long as a Live PTO tool IMHO. I think most users preferred using the foot clutch to stop movement rather than the PD neutral. 
 
6080 would be the perfect tractor if it had the power director....or a power shift of some kind.
ALLIS EXPRESS!
This year:
Back to Top
Charlie175 View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Shenandoah, VA
Points: 6368
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Charlie175 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 11:28am
Yes a PD would be great even if it didn't have the neutral.
Synch shifting is OK, but not the best
Charlie

'48 B, '51 CA, '56 WD45 '61 D17, '63 D12, '65 D10 , '68 One-Ninety XTD
Back to Top
injpumpEd View Drop Down
Orange Level Access
Orange Level Access
Avatar

Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Location: Walnut IL
Points: 5074
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote injpumpEd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 12:23pm
Originally posted by AC720Man AC720Man wrote:

The addition of a Intercooler added the extra hp from what I read. Same 433T engine.

That, along with about 20% more fuel output from the injection pump. The 6060 pump actually supersedes to the 6070 pump which is basically the same. The injectors and turbo are the same across all 3 models. 
210 "too hot to farm" puller, part of the "insane pumpkin posse". Owner of Guenther Heritage Diesel, specializing in fuel injection systems on heritage era tractors. stock rebuilds to all out pullers!
Back to Top
Lester View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Location: Indiana
Points: 518
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lester Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 12:26pm
Allis raised the compression on latter 433 so they would start better and put a milder turbo on the later 433 too .
Back to Top
victoryallis View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level


Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Location: Ludington mi
Points: 2878
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote victoryallis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 1:55pm
Originally posted by Eldon (WA) Eldon (WA) wrote:

Originally posted by Charlie175 Charlie175 wrote:

Forgot to add this was done as A-C did not have a "Live" PTO in this HP range. A-C Stuck with the PD way too long as a Live PTO tool IMHO. I think most users preferred using the foot clutch to stop movement rather than the PD neutral. 

 
6080 would be the perfect tractor if it had the power director....or a power shift of some kind.


Sounds like a good way to screw up a perfectly good tractor.
8030 and 8050MFWD, 7580, 3 6080's, 160, 7060, 175, heirloom D17, Deere 8760
Back to Top
Peterson View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Location: Westboro, Wi
Points: 864
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Peterson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Jan 2018 at 8:18pm
Only way to make a 6000 series better would be a shuttle shift. It's one of the best series of tractors allis ever had. That's why we have 4 of them. Could you one or two more.
7095-685I at 255hp, 8070-225HP,8050-210Hp,8030 with 155HP,220 with 670T engine with A-pump, 7580, 185 with 140HP, 2-6080's,6070, S4 D17,wd45,CA,st34 agco, S1 D17 with 3500MK2
Back to Top
Ron(AB) View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Location: Alberta
Points: 959
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ron(AB) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 2018 at 12:32am
Back to the OP.

There is approx. 3 inches difference in the wheelbase.

That will make a noticeable difference in a tight spot.
Back to Top
AC720Man View Drop Down
Orange Level
Orange Level
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Location: Shenandoah, Va
Points: 5148
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AC720Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Jan 2018 at 8:15pm
Wouldn’t a 6060 with its live pto and a PD have been sweet? Great tractor, dad has one, but man a power director with the synchronized trans would been sweet.
1968 B-208, 1976 720 (2 of them)Danco brush hog, single bottom plow,52" snow thrower, belly mower,rear tine tiller, rear blade, front blade, 57"sickle bar,1983 917 hydro, 1968 7hp sno-bee, 1968 190XTD
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.090 seconds.


Help Support the
Unofficial Allis Forum