![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History |
D17 rod bearings |
Post Reply ![]() |
Author | |
Doobletango ![]() Silver Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Jun 2020 Location: Illinois Points: 67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 23 Jun 2020 at 7:09pm |
I have a series 1 D17 that develop a knocking sound 2 weeks ago. After a lot of digging to get the oil pan off, I found the #3 rod loose on the crankshaft. Upon removing it the upper bearing is completely gone and the lower bearing is partially there. I’ve been carefully cleaning the the rod journal.
My IT manual says the rod journal should 2.995”. I have 2.365”ish. I pulled a good rod cap and checked it. The measurements are relatively the same. After measuring further (just with dial calipers to see roughly where I am at) I’m showing .0015” taper from ones side to the other. I have yet to polish the journal and actually use a mic on this to see where I’m actually at. 1. I’m guessing this engine has .030” bearings. Does this sound right? 2. Can anyone edify how much out of round, etc I have for play on this journal. I was really hoping this would be a quick/easy fix but it’s becoming more and more of a project. |
|
![]() |
|
Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Boss Man ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 03 Mar 2018 Location: Greenleaf, WI Points: 617 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Double check your measurement or typing. According to my math you have 5/8 of an inch clearance. Thats not possible. If this is a non diesel the rod journal is 2.374. That would mean your crank is .010 under. That amount of taper shouldn't be a huge concern as your clearance is .001-.003. Unless of course your running full load most of the time. Then I would consider pulling the crank and having it machined.
|
|
![]() |
|
Doobletango ![]() Silver Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Jun 2020 Location: Illinois Points: 67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I’ll recheck my measurements. Maybe I was looking at the wrong specs in my manual because what you’re saying sounds right.
|
|
![]() |
|
d17brown ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Location: farley iowa Points: 1704 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You were looking t main bearing size. 2.99
|
|
phil
|
|
![]() |
|
Doobletango ![]() Silver Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Jun 2020 Location: Illinois Points: 67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, after looking closer I see that. Lol
So here’s what I’ve got... I double checked with one of the good journals. Good journal: 2.3645” Questionable journal: 2.3505” Unless my math is wrong, I’m showing .014” wear. My manual says .001”-.003” so I’m WAY out of specs on this. So here’s my next question: am I better off buying a crankshaft with standard size journals, or waiting for a shop to grind this one down after I get the time to take it out? I’d one option better than another? |
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21462 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ask your machine shop to give you a quote on clean, magnaflux and regrind your mains and rods. The rod journals might have to go minus .030" to be true again. Then, have him price you a set of bearings. Now you can compare that total price to a different crank plus bearings for it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Doobletango ![]() Silver Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Jun 2020 Location: Illinois Points: 67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I’ve never done work on a setup this large-I’m used to small engines where you simply replace the whole connecting rod. Can I re-use the rod with an undersized bearing, assuming there’s no damage to the rod bearing surface?
|
|
![]() |
|
Boss Man ![]() Orange Level ![]() Joined: 03 Mar 2018 Location: Greenleaf, WI Points: 617 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Unless the rod is twisted, install the under sized bearing and your good to go.
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21462 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not if the old bearing shell has turned or damaged it. Resizing that rods big end would be in order.
|
|
![]() |
|
Doobletango ![]() Silver Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Jun 2020 Location: Illinois Points: 67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks guys. I thought that was the case.
Can the rod be removed from the bottom end without pulling the piston if need be? |
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21462 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
NO.
|
|
![]() |
|
DSeries4 ![]() Orange Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Ontario, Canada Points: 7451 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No such thing as a quick and easy fix when you get a knock in an engine.
|
|
'49 G, '54 WD45, '55 CA, '56 WD45D, '57 WD45, '58 D14, '59 D14, '60 D14, '61 D15D, '66 D15II, '66 D21II, '67 D17IV, '67 D17IVD, '67 190XTD, '73 620, '76 185, '77 175, '84 8030, '85 6080
|
|
![]() |
|
SteveM C/IL ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Location: Shelbyville IL Points: 8512 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Do what it takes to fix it right and be done. Cutting corners there could end up with junk.
|
|
![]() |
|
DaveKamp ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() ![]() Joined: 12 Apr 2010 Location: LeClaire, Ia Points: 5977 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Unfortunately, piston needs to go out the top in order to remove the wrist pin. Take your mic to that journal again, and check it in the vertical plane, and at 90 degrees to vertical... is the journal round, or out-of-round? Pulling it all down to go through it right would be the 'company line' way to solve it... but if the journal IS still round, and you don't have a bent rod, and you're not expecting brutal service out of it, an undersize bearing insert for an in-situ swap, carefully done, could buy you several years, perhaps more, before having to yank the engine for a full job. IF the big-end needs doctored, you'd hafta lift the piston out of the top anyway, but I know guys that would do some amazingly bold things with very little resources... I won't recommend, but I cannot deny that such things DID work... Realize that way-prior to the D, was the WC, WD, and WD45... the early WCs had shims, and when there was slack, one would simply remove a thin shim. That technology has passed onward with the appearance of replaceable inserts, but there's still validity in the concept. How hard are you gonna work it?
|
|
Ten Amendments, Ten Commandments, and one Golden Rule solve most every problem. Citrus hand-cleaner with Pumice does the rest.
|
|
![]() |
|
Doobletango ![]() Silver Level ![]() ![]() Joined: 21 Jun 2020 Location: Illinois Points: 67 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, I want to be able to run this tractor full throttle so I can mow with it.
|
|
![]() |
|
frnkeore ![]() Silver Level ![]() Joined: 07 May 2019 Location: Southern Oregon Points: 362 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If this happened, as you state:
Upon removing it the upper bearing is completely gone and the lower bearing is partially there. I’ve been carefully cleaning the the rod journal. I would buy a good used rod to replace it. When that happens, the rod is usually scored, pretty good, it might not be resizable and when they do resized, enough rod material has to taken of to allow it to be resized round. That gives you a little shorter rod and less compression. Personally, I don't like to do that and a used rod might be had for less than resizing. |
|
Frank
1959 D17 Series I #24001+, '59 D14 '55 & '59 Ford 850 & 861 Ferguson TO 35 Deluxe, Oliver 70 and 5 more. |
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis ![]() Orange Level Access ![]() Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 21462 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
BUT, I have seen rods from a different generation engine (remember 1953 thru 1975) weigh considerably more or less than the rod that is already in the engine. Resize if it all possible.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
|
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |