![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
| The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History | |
All-Crop Cylinder width |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
CrestonM
Orange Level
Joined: 08 Sep 2014 Location: Oklahoma Points: 8474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: All-Crop Cylinder widthPosted: 19 Jun 2015 at 12:40pm |
|
I was sitting around thinking yesterday...(I know...bad idea!!) and I got to thinking about the different cylinder widths of the All-Crops. For instance, a 60 has a 60 inch header and 60 inch cylinder. On the other hand, a 100 has a 48 inch cylinder and a 9 foot or 12 foot header. With this in mind, how large could a header could the 60" cylinder keep up with? 15'? I'm curious as to why A-C made these cylinders so wide, yet the headers so small.
|
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
TomYaz
Orange Level
Joined: 14 Sep 2009 Location: PA Points: 10341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jun 2015 at 12:43pm |
|
The diameter of the cylinder. I think that has something to do with it. 90/100 have significantly bigger diameter cylinders...
|
|
|
If its not an All-Crop, it all crap!
|
|
![]() |
|
DrAllis
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009 Points: 22808 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jun 2015 at 1:38pm |
|
The N-series rotary effectively had a 38 inch wide throat/concave and could handle 30 ft headers and 12-row cornheads. Your model 60's wouldn't handle too much more due to the drives and the HP of the tractors used.
|
|
![]() |
|
CrestonM
Orange Level
Joined: 08 Sep 2014 Location: Oklahoma Points: 8474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Jun 2015 at 2:26pm |
|
I guess both of those have something to do with it.
|
|
![]() |
|
Allis dave
Orange Level
Joined: 10 May 2012 Location: Northern IN Points: 3131 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jun 2015 at 7:40am |
|
This is all my opinion...
They designed the 60 with a 60" cylinder to easily feed into the cylinder properly. They found that they could run a little wider head and still be ok with the cylinder so they built a 66 and later a 72. When they designed a 90, they found that the narrower, but larger diameter cylinder would actually accept more crop and not plug as easily. I think the smaller diameter cylinder would have less momentum and thus slug and plug easier. The think the combines were released in this order 60, 66, 90, 72. The 90 and 72 may have been released at the same time, I don't remember. |
|
![]() |
|
CrestonM
Orange Level
Joined: 08 Sep 2014 Location: Oklahoma Points: 8474 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jun 2015 at 9:32am |
|
It was my understanding that the SP100 came before the 90.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |