![]() |
This site is not affiliated with AGCO Inc., Duluth GA., Allis-Chalmers Co., Milwaukee, WI., or any surviving or related corporate entity. All trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. All information presented herein should be considered the result of an un-moderated public forum with no responsibility for its accuracy or usability assumed by the users and sponsors of this site or any corporate entity. | |||||
| The Forum | Parts and Services | Unofficial Allis Store | Tractor Shows | Serial Numbers | History | |
7010,7020 vs 7030 |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
lars 60
Bronze Level
Joined: 07 Apr 2011 Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: 7010,7020 vs 7030Posted: 19 Apr 2011 at 6:41am |
|
Any ideas about the rlative merits of the 7010 20 compared to the 7030 (fuel economy, lugging ability of 301 vs 426)
|
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
MACK
Orange Level
Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Points: 7664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Apr 2011 at 8:16am |
|
Fuel economy is alot better on the 301 over the 426. As far as lugging the 426 is better but if they pull down it is time to shift gears. MACK
|
|
![]() |
|
Orange Blood
Orange Level
Joined: 29 Nov 2010 Location: ColoradoSprings Points: 4053 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Apr 2011 at 3:35pm |
|
The newer marron 426s don't lug much below 1500 RPM, depending on how you set the fuel, the cam and turbo just wont let it. I can't say on the newer 301s, but the 190XT will outlug the 7060, rpm wise. (not talking hp) Not so with the older 426s, like in the D21, so the newer 301s might be in the same boat.
|
|
|
Still in use:
HD7 WC C CA WD 2-WD45 WD45LP WD45D D14 3-D17 D17LP 2-D19D D19LP 190XTD 190XTLP 720 D21 220 7020 7030 7040 7045 3-7060 Projects: 3-U UC 2-G 2-B 2-C CA 7-WC RC WDLP WF D14 D21 210 7045 N7 |
|
![]() |
|
tomNE
Orange Level
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Location: dorchester, ne Points: 1225 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Apr 2011 at 6:10pm |
|
7010's and 20's are a newer style and much nicer; better built tractors. fuel economy is tons better with a 301. depending on trannies but both the 7010-20 should have a much more modern trans setup.
|
|
|
AC from the start of my families farming career till the end!
|
|
![]() |
|
Lonn
Orange Level
Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Apr 2011 at 8:08pm |
|
Unless they are power shifts I like the stick on the floor of a 7030 over the t handle shift on the 7010-20. Other than stadium lights and fuel usage I don't see much advantage of a 7010-20 vs 7030. I suppose there were little updates here and there like I think gears were changed for better ratios and better gear engagement. All real good tractors.
hhhmmm............now I'm typing in italics and don't know why?????????????
|
|
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|
![]() |
|
lars 60
Bronze Level
Joined: 07 Apr 2011 Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Apr 2011 at 9:14pm |
|
Thanks guys, looked at a real nice 7010 the other day am a little leary of the shift linkage believe it uses a cable.
|
|
![]() |
|
Lonn
Orange Level
Joined: 16 Sep 2009 Location: Назарово,Russia Points: 29817 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Apr 2011 at 9:32pm |
|
|
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink I am a Russian Bot |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |