Print Page | Close Window

Need opinion......

Printed From: Unofficial Allis
Category: Allis Chalmers
Forum Name: Farm Equipment
Forum Description: everything about Allis-Chalmers farm equipment
URL: https://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=46470
Printed Date: 04 Sep 2025 at 1:58am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Need opinion......
Posted By: donkey
Subject: Need opinion......
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 8:57am
Morning everyone,
Is a "B", "C", or "CA" large enough to maintain less than 10 acres?
Would consist of brush hogging about three acres a couple times a year and maintain
the 500' driveway.  One with a sickle mower would really be handy along the road.  Last tractor I used was Belarus FWA 65 hp and I spent all my time turning.  Am I better off stepping up to WD or WD45 for the money?  Thanks Jeff





Replies:
Posted By: wfmurray
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 9:11am
Depends on how much time you want to spend in the seat . We cultivated 50 acres with a farmall cub one year and it was about half the size you mention.


Posted By: CTuckerNWIL
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 9:15am
I would look for a WD or 45.They might use a little more fuel but get more work done faster. A CA might be handy but not as cheap to buy as a WD.
 My Dad farmed from 1951 to about 1967 with nothing but a CA with 60 tillable acres.


-------------
http://www.ae-ta.com" rel="nofollow - http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF


Posted By: JimD
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 9:20am
Usually you can find a WD for almost the same money as a B.  The B is easier to haul, but the WD's hand clutch, weight, and easier to use hydraulics would make me grab the WD first almost every time.
JImD


-------------
Owner of http://www.OKtractor.com" rel="nofollow - OKtractor.com PM for an instant response on parts. Open M-F 9-6 Central.

We have new and used parts. 877-378-6543


Posted By: GregLawlerMinn
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 9:22am
Jeff
A CA will handle a 5' brush hog and pull a back blade just fine; since the B and C have the same engine and similar power, believe they would work also. Personally would not use a B or C for brush hogging without an overriding clutch on the pto; the hand clutch, better hydraulics and 4 speed tranny make the CA a better tractor than the B or C.
A WD or WD45 would probably be a better value, have more power, and are more readily available than the CA.


-------------
What this country needs is more unemployed politicians-and lawyers.
Currently have: 1 D14 and a D15S2.
With new owners: 2Bs,9CAs,1WD,2 D12s,5D14s,3D15S2s, 2D17SIVs,D17D,1D19D;1 Unstyled WC


Posted By: donkey
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 7:44pm
Does a B, C, & CA all have the same engine?


Posted By: Stan R
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 8:19pm
I'd go for the CA. My father had one when I was a kid and it was a great tractor. Besides, do you really want to finish the mowing fast??!!


Posted By: donkey
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 8:26pm
I am with you Stan great way to relax!


Posted By: CTuckerNWIL
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 8:39pm
Originally posted by donkey donkey wrote:

Does a B, C, & CA all have the same engine?

Pretty much. There were changes over time but the later B's had the same CE engine as the CA. The block is the same, early B's had a smaller bore. When the C came out the engines went to the CE which had the bigger bore.


-------------
http://www.ae-ta.com" rel="nofollow - http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF


Posted By: Protrucker
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 8:49pm
So, what year would the B's have started having the CE engine?


Posted By: CTuckerNWIL
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 9:12pm
Bryan Smiths website say 1943??  I thought they came out with the C in 1940.



-------------
http://www.ae-ta.com" rel="nofollow - http://www.ae-ta.com
Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF


Posted By: allismanamp
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 9:18pm
for 10 acres i would cough up the extra cash and get a nice CA allis with a wide front and a 3 pt hitch they are one of the most affordable tractors to run when mowing and are nice and small for getting turned around and getting around things i have used both the 45 and the ca model allis tractors and my little CA is great and much easier to turn than the 45 unless you find one with power steering but that is just my 2 cents i know the CA allis are sot after by lots of collecters and hold there resale very well but i would never part with my CA i love that tractor and know what i have after redoing everything on it all thats left is the paint and i know once i do that i wont want to work with it anymore so for now it will stay my A1 work tractor

Smile


-------------
~AMP~


Posted By: ewbs79
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 9:35pm
Wow that's alot of information so basically if I was to try one of the two on a baler the c would be a better choice but either way its probably going to be a headache their both going to operate same speed same motor but where does the extra hp come from with same ground speed and hp


Posted By: ewbs79
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 9:38pm
Sorry last post wrong subject lol



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net