cost of machine shop work
Printed From: Unofficial Allis
Category: Allis Chalmers
Forum Name: Farm Equipment
Forum Description: everything about Allis-Chalmers farm equipment
URL: https://www.allischalmers.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=44671
Printed Date: 05 Aug 2025 at 5:01pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: cost of machine shop work
Posted By: LouSWPA
Subject: cost of machine shop work
Date Posted: 29 Jan 2012 at 5:07pm
weld and re-machine thrust surface, reface journals and bearings for a WD-45 crank.....$540! mag block, square deck surface and counter bore sleeve seats $700-800
------------- I am still confident of this; I will see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait for the Lord; be strong and take heart and wait for the Lord. Ps 27
|
Replies:
Posted By: CTuckerNWIL
Date Posted: 29 Jan 2012 at 5:14pm
Time to look for a different engine. There are blocks out there that don't need anything but cleaned up. Find a running engine for $400 that doesn't have slop fore and aft in the crankshaft and you'ld be money ahead probably. Does your block need that work, or is a salesman selling the job to ya?
------------- http://www.ae-ta.com" rel="nofollow - http://www.ae-ta.com Lena 1935 WC12xxx, Willie 1951 CA6xx Dad bought new, 1954WD45 PS, 1960 D17 NF
|
Posted By: EricSWPA
Date Posted: 29 Jan 2012 at 5:16pm
Thats pretty pricey on the crank i had a case crank welded and machined for 400 or so a year ago id think about buying a new crank from valu bilt at that price.
|
Posted By: LouSWPA
Date Posted: 29 Jan 2012 at 5:40pm
CTuckerNWIL wrote:
Time to look for a different engine. There are blocks out there that don't need anything but cleaned up. Find a running engine for $400 that doesn't have slop fore and aft in the crankshaft and you'ld be money ahead probably. Does your block need that work, or is a salesman selling the job to ya?
|
Charlie, I don't see the need in the mag check, that was the shop man's idea, but the deck is just barely out of spec and I vacillated back and forth on getting the deck squared.
------------- I am still confident of this; I will see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait for the Lord; be strong and take heart and wait for the Lord. Ps 27
|
Posted By: CAL(KS)
Date Posted: 29 Jan 2012 at 5:53pm
2010 valu-bilt catalog
new crank WD45 $333.32 less bearings
reground with bearings $463.14
i could see spending extra money if your wanting it stroked but for that price you'd be better off using it as a core
------------- Me -C,U,UC,WC,WD45,190XT,TL-12,145T,HD6G,HD16,HD20
Dad- WD, D17D, D19D, RT100A, 7020, 7080,7580, 2-8550's, 2-S77, HD15
|
Posted By: david a
Date Posted: 29 Jan 2012 at 5:53pm
Some time the voc school will take on a project for the price of parts
|
Posted By: SteveM C/IL
Date Posted: 29 Jan 2012 at 11:06pm
Lou! Ohio Orange has a Gleaner engine in the classifieds for 600 bucks.
I had my block decked a smidge.The ctr bores aren't quite on the same plane as the deck but close enough.I think in retrospect,I would have been ok to just put it back together but.... You can probably skip that too and be alright. I believe these old girls need to be way of before it matters. Old school thinking here.LOL
|
Posted By: DonDittmar
Date Posted: 30 Jan 2012 at 10:51am
Time to look for a new machine shop........IMO
------------- Experience is a fancy name for past mistakes. "Great moments are born from great opportunity"
1968 D15D,1962 D19D Also 1965 Cub Loboy and 1958 JD 720 Diesel Pony Start
|
Posted By: Butch(OH)
Date Posted: 30 Jan 2012 at 11:12am
His prices are not out of line. That type of work is out of consideration for any engine that has cheap replacement parts available. Big difference.
|
Posted By: LouSWPA
Date Posted: 30 Jan 2012 at 11:36am
SteveM C/IL wrote:
Lou! Ohio Orange has a Gleaner engine in the classifieds for 600 bucks.
I had my block decked a smidge.The ctr bores aren't quite on the same plane as the deck but close enough.I think in retrospect,I would have been ok to just put it back together but.... You can probably skip that too and be alright. I believe these old girls need to be way of before it matters. Old school thinking here.LOL |
Steve, I saw OO's post but axed the Gleaner engine idea as it would take finding some scarce parts (more money). I'm thinking like you, I don't believe it really needs decked.....torque the head to specs, run engine awhile, re-torque and I'll bet it'll still be running long after I've departed this earth!
------------- I am still confident of this; I will see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait for the Lord; be strong and take heart and wait for the Lord. Ps 27
|
Posted By: LouSWPA
Date Posted: 30 Jan 2012 at 12:11pm
Steve, In line with your "old school" thinking, a couple of years ago a good friend and neighbor asked me to look at his Ford 600 (I think), as it had a strange sound. I determined it to be a rod bearing. dropped pan and pulled cap. bearing shot, crank journal scored some, with two spots where debris had been pounded into crank......'bout the size of eye of a sewing needle. So I tell buddy crank needs to come out, rebuilt, etc
Now, ya gotta know "Bill", owner of tractor. Bill is an engineer, very intelligent, and not afraid to get his hands dirty. Bill is also not destitute, nor is he cheap, but, he delights in finding the most economical way of doing things.
Bill doesn't want to pull the crank, wants to avoid the expense. So, I suggested an alternate plan, under protest. I used ultrafine files to dress the high ridge where the debris had been forced into the journal, and then polished the journal by hand with emery cloth and scotch-bright. Then, I discovered that I could get one bearing, rather than a whole set from NAPA (wife ran a NAPA store at the time), so I had wife get me .015, .020, and I think .030 bearings and I used plastigage to test fit each bearing, checking four places, 90 degrees apart on journal. .020 was closes I could get, sent the others back. lubed bearing, torqued cap, replaced pan fired it up. He worked that tractor hard for a season and a half before it grenaded!
------------- I am still confident of this; I will see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait for the Lord; be strong and take heart and wait for the Lord. Ps 27
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 30 Jan 2012 at 4:09pm
One thing with putting a Gleaner engine in it it won't act like a 45 anymore. I'm talking about the snap that only a 45 has. It will run nice and have more power but something will be lost. That's just my thinking though. I did put one in Dad's old WC and it does sound sweet and runs sweet but the sound is different.
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: Dipstick In
Date Posted: 30 Jan 2012 at 4:18pm
Lonn I wonder why that would be, a different cam grind or something? Still trying to learn cause Im wanting to use a combine motor in a build for a WD.
------------- You don't really have to be smart if you know who is!
|
Posted By: GregLawlerMinn
Date Posted: 30 Jan 2012 at 5:59pm
Had my CE engine crank ground 0.020 U/S and the rods reconditioned (so would not need to shim the bearings) for $180. Tanked block, decked, new cam bushings installed, sleeves counterbored and front and rear seals installed for $250. Complete head rebuild for $400 (included 4 hardened steel inserts for the exhaust valves).
------------- What this country needs is more unemployed politicians-and lawyers. Currently have: 1 D14 and a D15S2. With new owners: 2Bs,9CAs,1WD,2 D12s,5D14s,3D15S2s, 2D17SIVs,D17D,1D19D;1 Unstyled WC
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 30 Jan 2012 at 7:49pm
Just put it back together need nothing more than a flat file and lapping compound .smear grey loctite on low spots .fill radiator with two quarts of liquid silicon .oh you need a round file for mains. Wrap some aluminum foil to take up cam bearing clearance.roll the used rings in sand to rough edges and remove carbon or rust. Run it hard till she blows or idle it from barns to show
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 7:06am
Dipstick In wrote:
Lonn I wonder why that would be, a different cam grind or something? Still trying to learn cause Im wanting to use a combine motor in a build for a WD. |
Don't get me wrong. The Gleaner engine will be nice and a better engine. It's the lighter weight of the crank that gives the 45 it's snap. That's the only thing I can think of. A Wd won't have that same sound either because of the shorter stroke. The 45 IMO was made just right for what it did.
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: SteveM C/IL
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 8:57am
That dog won't hunt Lonn.Larger mains ain't enough mass to change it plus its on center,not swinging. BUT....you are right about "not the same". My uncle had a 45 and D17ser4,both bought new,and the 17 was doggy.
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 9:46am
I tend to see the d17 having more bearing speed friction from increased bearing size but the quality machine work not needing shims on a 17 engine probably cancells out the smaller bearing on the 45 block and the 17 center main thrust gives the advantage.
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 10:15am
SteveM C/IL wrote:
That dog won't hunt Lonn.Larger mains ain't enough mass to change it plus its on center,not swinging. BUT....you are right about "not the same". My uncle had a 45 and D17ser4,both bought new,and the 17 was doggy. |
You tell me why then. I've swapped cams, carbs, governor weights, etc. About everything but flywheel and crank. The 45 is distinct and I blame the crank. On center doesn't mean heavier weight can be turned up to speed as fast as a lighter weight. If it's heavier, to me at least, it still takes more effort to get it going. I'm not a mathematician though. Someone here should be able to show some figures.
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 11:50am
when i get time i wil run the numbe
< name=my ="compute.">
Bearing parameter |
Value |
Status |
Piston Bore Dia. : |
< ="check., , compute" =compute. value=0.0 size=6 name=bore> in. |
< readOnly size=6 name=borestat2> |
Compression Ratio :(Max = 15) |
< ="check., , compute" =compute. value=0 size=3 name=cr>:1 |
< readOnly size=6 name=crstat> |
Max operating speed : |
< ="check., , compute" =compute. value=0 size=6 name=rpm> RPM |
< readOnly size=6 name=rpmstat> |
This bearing has an oil hole This bearing has an oil groove |
< =compute. value=1 = name=kkk2> < =compute. value=1 = name=kkk2> |
|
Oil Grove width : |
< ="check., , compute" =compute. value=.030 size=6 name=gwidth> in. |
< readOnly size=6 name=gwstat> |
Select one for Main Bearings : (Max Load is 700 PSI) Rod Bearings : (Max Load is 2500 PSI) |
< =compute. value=1 = name=bear0> < =compute. value=2 = name=bear0> |
|
Select one for main bearings only: This crank is supported by 1 bearing This crank is supported by 2 bearings |
< =compute. value=1 = name=bear1> < =compute. value=2 = name=bear1> |
|
Enter the length of the bearing (inches): |
< =compute. value=0 size=6 name=l> in. |
< readOnly size=6 name=lstat> |
Enter the bore of the bearing (inches): |
< =compute. value=0 size=6 name=d> in. |
< readOnly size=6 name=dstat> |
Bearing L/D Ratio |
< value=0 readOnly size=6 name=ld> |
< readOnly size=6 name=ldstat> |
Shaft Velocity |
< value=0 readOnly size=6 name=sfpm>SFPM |
< value=INFO readOnly size=6 name=sfpmstat> |
Peak Piston Pressure |
< value=0.0 readOnly size=6 name=ww2> PSI |
< readOnly size=6 name=ww2stat> |
Bearing Load < value="Max = 700 PSI" readOnly size=14 name=bearinf> |
< value=0.0 readOnly size=6 name=bearpres> PSI |
< readOnly size=6 name=bearpresstat> |
Pressure Velocity (Max = 1500K) |
< value=0.0 readOnly size=6 name=prevel>K |
< readOnly size=6 name=prevelstat> | rs on this format
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: KGood
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 12:50pm
What about flywheel weight and diameter. The PD is alot heavyer than 3 disc hand clutch. Just by looking I think the 17 crank pully is bigger so it would be driving fan and gen. faster. Just all these things together makes a difference. I would only want the 17 crank for my tuggers though.
|
Posted By: KGood
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 12:54pm
By the way I was comparing the two different tractors. I know the gleaner engines we have got seem to have small manifolds.
|
Posted By: SteveM C/IL
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 1:35pm
to some degree you'd be right Lonn about larger mass on center takeing more energy to spin up but what KGood said about the PD clutch makes the most sense to me.I don't know if the large dia flwhl weighs more than the small heavy 45's but I think larger takes more energy than smaller of same wieght.Moment of inertia thing.High school physics was a long time ago. As an aside,my 6th grade class went to Chicago Museum of Science and Industry. They had a large long round chunk of steel with a crank handle on the end.it was in a saddle riding on oil film.Took a lot of pull to make it turn but then you couln't stop it either. Mass,enertia,stored energy....kinda cool.
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 2:26pm
actually the larger the diameter the flywheel is the less it can weigh to accomplish the same energy stored.
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 3:01pm
Push in the clutch on the D17 and compare it to a 45 even with the clutch fully engaged and still the 45 is a different animal. I believe it's got to be the crank and probably the flywheel. Dad used to say that his old 45 could keep pace with the D17. Now he never had both at the same time as he traded the 45 in on the 17. The WD45 is truly is a unique tractor. Actually amazing like few other tractors in my very prejudice one sided mind. LOL
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 31 Jan 2012 at 5:19pm
well i said i would so i did . A WD 45 with Lpg compression ratio has 3.16 ftlbs of crank bearing friction load . A d17 with 7.1 comp . ratio 3.28ftlbs of bearing friction load both were done at factory high idle.
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: SteveM C/IL
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 12:39am
So Mitch! Are you saying the friction in the 17 is enough more to show up in "snap". Is that a total # from all brgs? If so .12 lb/ft doesn't sound like enough to notice.
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 6:57am
Doesn't sound like much to me either but what do I know. I do know that there is a difference between a 45 and 17 when it comes to engine reaction to load. I have put D17 pistons in a 45 and if I remember right it still had that snap. I'll have to go over to the owner of that tractor someday and give it a test run. It's my cousin's 45.
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: Steve in NJ
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 7:12am
Well, pretty soon ole Fred should have his "in house" machine shop set up n' ready to roll, and everybody can bring their engines to the Fredster to get their machine work done. I'm bringing my little G engine down for a rebuild....
mailto:Steve@B&B" rel="nofollow - Steve@B&B
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 8:03am
I think its more the horsepower increase and the ability to hold power that makes the govenor not feal as snappy after running program. It was interesting though to run the program on 1/2 inch difference in diameter and comp. ratio and engine rpm to see . If you have identical rpms and compression ratio the ftlbs go to the same on both bearing diameters and untill running the program at 1985 rpms on both i would have thought they would have been some difference due to the 1/2 inch in diameter difference. We also didnt take into account crank overlap which the d17 crank will clearly win that . I also didnt exceed the 1985 rpms or 7 to1 compression ratio nor did bearing design come into play but could run more hypothetical numbers if one wants to evaluate more rigid.
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: KGood
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 8:33am
The linkage from carb to lever needs to be right distance. Some manuals explain some on the procedure. My Dad usually does this for us by bending the lever one way or another. To far one way it will surge like an oliver to far another it will be a super dog or no acceleration at all under a sudden load. Allis was legendary on the snappiness of there gov. just wish it was built a little heavier. Our D17 grenaded the gov. at 2400rpm then went on to ruin the gov gear and crank gear. I have heard of several others breaking the weights off.
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 8:50am
I always go by the book on syncronizing the governor. Use an Allis manual cause the I&T manuals gets it backwards. It makes a difference.
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: XT in pa
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 9:03am
Lou call me. I might be able to help. 724-255-9904
Shawn
------------- 190XT,D17and 7045
|
Posted By: Rod B
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 11:02am
The main reason that a WD-45 governer acts different than the D-17 is simple. It is SPRING RATE and the tension on the spring to start with. Put a WD-45 spring in the D-17. Set it to rated WD-45 RPM and see how the engine responds.
It is not the crankshaft weight or the the .36 ft/lb change in rolling torque on the main berrings. That is a verry small percentage of a single horse power at rated speed.
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 11:40am
Rod B wrote:
The main reason that a WD-45 governer acts different than the D-17 is simple. It is SPRING RATE and the tension on the spring to start with. Put a WD-45 spring in the D-17. Set it to rated WD-45 RPM and see how the engine responds.
It is not the crankshaft weight or the the .36 ft/lb change in rolling torque on the main berrings. That is a verry small percentage of a single horse power at rated speed. |
I don't believe that's it. I've had engines where I've put different springs. I never put a 45 spring in a D17 but have put a 45 governor complete on a 45 with a D17 engine. I still say it's the weight difference in crank and probably flywheel although a 17 engine in a 45 with a 45 flywheel make no difference. The 45 engines has more snap.
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 12:30pm
for the pullers out there at a compression ratio of 11.1 static 10.5 effective intake closing at 86 degrees 150 cfm. the 2.475 main bearing at 3000 rpms has 18.73 ftlbs of drag the 3 inch bearing has 20.18
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: SteveM C/IL
Date Posted: 01 Feb 2012 at 8:29pm
Get a nasty call from Fred Stevo? Machinist from out west my a$$
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 7:43am
The other day rod b made a comment on lowering rod journal size. Still playing with engine bearing friction droping 3/8 in the rod journal reduces a full 2 lbs off engines total friction. I guess them nascar boys are on to something when they go to the 1.88 rod journal
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: Fred in Pa
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 7:54am
What the #&!! got this post off TRACK !!!!!
|
Posted By: Butch(OH)
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 7:56am
Fred in Pa wrote:
What the #&!! got this post off TRACK !!!!! |
It was invaded by a rocket scientist
|
Posted By: Rod B
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 8:02am
You mean bottle rocket scientist.
I was picking on the class clown about narrowing the rods in his engine build. A narrow crankpin is stronger than a wide one, and if it matters the narrow berring has less drag.
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 8:21am
Rod b the proper name is crank fillet radius. Some just know enough to aggitate . Narrowing rod without knowing the crank fillet radius is just loosing oil pressure unless your opening up the clearance to use a bent rod. Everything one chooses to do engine wise comes with gains and losses. Getting the most gain for the least drawbacks is when you start challenging material composition
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 8:38am
Fred in Pa wrote:
What the #&!! got this post off TRACK !!!!! |
It's kinda funny ain't :•)
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: Butch(OH)
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 8:43am
mlpankey wrote:
Narrowing rod without knowing the crank fillet radius is just loosing oil pressure unless your opening up the clearance to use a bent rod. Everything one chooses to do engine wise comes with gains and losses. Getting the most gain for the least drawbacks is when you start challenging material composition |
That does it, I am never going to open up another post on here while drinking or eating!!!
,,, another darned keyboard ruined and monitor sprayed with pepsi and spit.
|
Posted By: Rod B
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 9:56am
mlpankey wrote:
Rod b the proper name is crank fillet radius. Some just know enough to aggitate . Narrowing rod without knowing the crank fillet radius is just loosing oil pressure unless your opening up the clearance to use a bent rod. Everything one chooses to do engine wise comes with gains and losses. Getting the most gain for the least drawbacks is when you start challenging material composition |
Oh no I agitated pankey. Forgive me for I am sorry for I was only amuseing myself at his expense, which is verry easy to do.
LMAO that's funny. I thought someone asked him to "self deport"
|
Posted By: Fred in Pa
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 10:20am
MORE !!!!!!!!!!!!!! MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! PLEASE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Posted By: Lonn
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 11:22am
------------- -- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... - Wink I am a Russian Bot
|
Posted By: Ken(MI)
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 11:57am
Entertainment at its finest, this is!!
|
Posted By: mlpankey
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 12:40pm
If I we're to deport rod your education would quit.yes as you pointed out I prefer non circular contours . I expect 500 word essay on this next like your Wisconsin friend does shortly.
------------- people if they don't already know it you can't tell them. quote yogi berra
|
Posted By: Butch(OH)
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 3:20pm
Lou, I am starting to think you are a trouble maker,,
|
Posted By: LouSWPA
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 3:24pm
Seems to follow me around doesn't it, Butch!
------------- I am still confident of this; I will see the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living. Wait for the Lord; be strong and take heart and wait for the Lord. Ps 27
|
Posted By: Gary in da UP
Date Posted: 02 Feb 2012 at 5:00pm
LouSWPA wrote:
weld and re-machine thrust surface, reface journals and bearings for a WD-45 crank.....$540!
mag block, square deck surface and counter bore sleeve seats $700-800 |
Heck , Lou, I 'll answer your question. You may live in an area where machine shops are all doing hi quality, no compromise work. And those prices are probably not out of line for an established shop with well qualified machinists, using the most accurate machines and tooling available. You may not require that level of work for your application, my advice.... shop around, there is ALWAYS some one who WILL do any job CHEAPER.
PS you really do know how to bring out the best of the peanut gallery ! And I think they should throw in an align bore,recondition the rods, complete balance job, and all the head work, too. LOL
|
|