| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
72AC200 
Bronze Level
Joined: 14 Mar 2018
Location: Swanton
Points: 42
|
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote  Reply
 Topic: 175 or 185 for a second work tractor
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 4:09pm |
|
I have been thanking about getting a 175 gas or 185 diesel for a second work tractor for pulling a 6 row planter, 6ft brush hogging, 3 point mount sprayer, maybe some work with a 14ft RWA disk and maybe some plowing with a 3 bottom and pull wagons at harvest time . I have a 200 to do the tillage work with. I'm thinking about something to do the things that I don't need my 200 to be doing . Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Edited by 72AC200 - 29 Oct 2019 at 4:43pm
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
lowell66dart
Orange Level
Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Location: Paulina La.
Points: 964
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 5:20pm |
|
Why gas on the 175. The Perkins is a nice diesel and when you put a gear reduction starter on them they really start well.
|
|
AC 6080 (8030,7060,200,175,D-17HC, 6040,160,6140 all gone) Farmall 1066 & 656 Hi-Clear (for sale), White 2-62 High Clearance, JD 4255 Hi Clear.
|
|
Kurzy
Orange Level
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Location: WSS, Montana
Points: 808
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 5:43pm |
Howdy 72AC200, Hands down the 185, you can't go wrong with a AC 185!!
Kurzy
|
|
FREEDGUY
Orange Level Access
Joined: 15 Apr 2017
Location: South West Mich
Points: 5396
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 5:53pm |
|
Any reason you're omitting a 180 ??
|
|
plummerscarin
Orange Level Access
Joined: 22 Jun 2015
Location: ia
Points: 3768
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 6:13pm |
|
Love using the 185 here
|
|
DougG
Orange Level
Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Location: Mo
Points: 8255
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 6:33pm |
|
185 FOR SURE ! Perfect fit for that disc, and the hum of that 301 diesel is awesome
|
|
AC720Man
Orange Level
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Location: Shenandoah, Va
Points: 5131
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 6:36pm |
|
My best friend has a 175 Diesel with a AC loader on it. It has over 7000 hours on it and has been a great tractor for him. Neighbors have 185’s that have been equally reliable. I guess what I am saying either tractor if it has been properly maintained should give you good service. Now, its a determination of size that suits you best.
|
|
1968 B-208, 1976 720 (2 of them)Danco brush hog, single bottom plow,52" snow thrower, belly mower,rear tine tiller, rear blade, front blade, 57"sickle bar,1983 917 hydro, 1968 7hp sno-bee, 1968 190XTD
|
|
HD6GTOM
Orange Level
Joined: 30 Nov 2009
Location: MADISON CO IA
Points: 6627
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 7:34pm |
|
185 is large enough to run a big round baler. It would easily pull the equipment you describe. It would have been my choice if I hadn't found my series 4 diesel.
|
|
victoryallis
Orange Level
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Location: Ludington mi
Points: 2878
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 7:54pm |
|
6070 or 80
|
|
8030 and 8050MFWD, 7580, 3 6080's, 160, 7060, 175, heirloom D17, Deere 8760
|
|
jiminnd
Orange Level
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Location: Rutland ND
Points: 2271
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 8:34pm |
|
I like the 185 for the just about flat floor board, looked at 175 too and didn't like straddling the transmission.
|
|
1945 C, 1949 WF and WD, 1981 185, 1982 8030, unknown D14(nonrunner)
|
|
john(MI)
Orange Level
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: SE MI
Points: 9262
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 Oct 2019 at 8:41pm |
|
I gotta agree, the D17 would work out great for you for that purpose.
|
|
D14, D17, 5020, 612H, CASE 446
|
|
Lonn
Orange Level
Joined: 16 Sep 2009
Location: Назарово,Russia
Points: 29792
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 6:43am |
|
For a 6 row planter go with the 185.
|
|
-- --- .... .- -- -- .- -.. / .-- .- ... / .- / -- ..- .-. -.. . .-. .. -. --. / -.-. .... .. .-.. -.. / .-. .- .--. .. ... -
Wink
I am a Russian Bot
|
|
Trinity45
Orange Level Access
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Location: Kentucky
Points: 1823
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 7:10am |
|
Well if you are going to pull a 14' disk and a 6 row planter I would go with the 185, more power and weight with that 6 cylinder, the 6' bush hog would be a bit small for the 185, I have a 185 and a 6' will not cut out the tire tracks, I have a 7' and it barely cuts out the tracks. I had a 175 witht a perkins, great tractor easy to start, when my father passed we let it go.
|
|
DMiller
Orange Level Access
Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Location: Hermann, Mo
Points: 33143
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 7:29am |
|
My 180 handles a 3008 8' Bush Hog weighs in at 1800lbs, 540 gearboxes, had to add a 500 loader for ballast to drag that 3 point monster. 185 is same tractor with minor improvements as hydraulic PTO instead of mechanical and option to 1000pto, Running gear is same, hydraulics same. I pull a 540 Massey 12' disc with little issues, have a 4/14 that can pretty much bury and will handle that. Bought a Cough Cough GAG Four row Deere Planter but have not gotten it where I need it to use it yet. Mine still has 18.4 28s rears 9.5L 15s front on it, hard to find 28s at any reasonable price, wish I had 5 rail thirties on it.
|
|
DanWi
Orange Level Access
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Location: wttn
Points: 1900
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 9:00am |
|
A couple of the jobs the 185 would be a little better at. The 175 might be just a hair better for the small jobs. Start looking for 1 of each.
|
|
bradley6874
Orange Level
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Location: salisbury md
Points: 1349
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 10:45am |
|
6080 with cab will be more efficient to operate and the 200 will be the back up
|
|
You can wash the dirt off the body but you can’t wash the farmer out of the heart and soul
|
|
jaybmiller
Orange Level Access
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
Location: Greensville,Ont
Points: 24350
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 12:47pm |
OK, I have to ask, why not another 200 ,same as you have ? Common spare parts, same levers, operation, etc.
I'm thinking the 200 is 'busy' and 3pt can be PITA to change things... a 2nd tractor would be a blessing.
Just curious.... Jay
Edited by jaybmiller - 30 Oct 2019 at 2:53pm
|
|
3 D-14s,A-C forklift, B-112
Kubota BX23S lil' TOOT( The Other Orange Tractor)
Never burn your bridges, unless you can walk on water
|
|
DougG
Orange Level
Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Location: Mo
Points: 8255
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 1:06pm |
|
Good point there JB,, they are around very reasonably priced
|
|
Gary Burnett
Orange Level Access
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Location: Virginia
Points: 3010
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 2:08pm |
If he doesn't want to use the 200 he has now for those jobs why would he want another one use for those jobs? Most 185 tractors I have ever seen have the hydraulic engaging PTO,most 190 and a couple 200 models I've seen have only the mechanical engaging PTO, that right there would make me choose the 185.
|
|
allisbred
Orange Level Access
Joined: 28 Mar 2015
Location: Hanover Pa
Points: 1011
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 Oct 2019 at 2:47pm |
|
Sounds like the 185 would be my choice for all around small work. Don’t think the 6ft mower would work well with the 175 or 185. You will appreciate the 185 weight more for the rest of your applications and the 301 has a lot torque at low rpms. We have (1) 175 D, (3) 185’s, (1) 200. All are nice tractors but the 185’s will do most all light tillage and small jobs well. There are a lot of older 185’s out there with the manual PTO, hydraulic was and option on 180,185,200, seems like it was more standard on later tractors.
|
|
