Steve A wrote:
shear strength of 3/4 plywood used vertically? In this example using 12 inch X 8 ft pieces of plywood laminated side by side in a staggered arrangement screwed and glued to build a beam? ...Just looking for something like a span table to get a general idea. |
Woah, Steve... hangon here... I think you've got some terms mixed up here. There's different types of loads, and they aren't interchangable in terminology. Shear loading, and columnar loading occurs, but is not in the same realm as beams and spans.
If you're suggesting making an I-beam shape using laminated plywood, you need to know exactly how you'll be affixing and loading the I-beam to determine wether it will sustain any shear or columnar loading. This is why manufactured microlam beams are documented for very specific use, not general purpose loading.
Most metallic structural shapes (i.e. rolled steels, extruded aluminum, etc) will be extremely predictable in general-purpose loading calculations because the forming will result in predictable character (stress/strain/deformation/yield) as well as ultimate failure, and any grainulation which occurs can be included. [aluminum is a very highly grained metal, so loading stresses always need to respect natural grain]
Plywood, however, is a composite, and does NOT have any enforcement of grain, and unless you're using a marine voidless, you won't have predictable adhesive or cavity quality assurance.
So the only 'safe' way to build, if you're building based on sandwiched plywood, is to use considerably more material, and expand it's operating area well beyond the stress centers.
Note- I'm not saying it cannot be done... I've got a local pal who's an aeronautical structural engineer, his grandfather built DeHavilland Mosquitos... I'm just saying that the question you're asking doesn't fully make sense... it's like asking wether you walk to school, or carry your lunch. Illustrate what you're attempting to do, explain what load you're trying to support, I'm absolutely certain we can figure it out in a way that you can get a sufficient answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Duhp, I see that you got your answer fast. Good.
More than likely, if it's a ranch-style house, that wall between is not a 'load bearing' structure, so the only serious concern is wether the walls on each end lose any rigidity as a result of the loss of that third dimension of support inside.
IF they were to apply structure above the ceiling to recover that rigidity, it'd be a circumstance of balance and compromise. In the ceiling, it'd be acting as just a stiffener of the walls below, and the attachment method would be the weakest point, as all the stiffening action would be concentrated at it's attachment to the existing wall. Think of it like a for-purpose frame member of a clear-span building, where the legs and overhead beam are assembled and stood... the weak point is where the legs attach to that beam.
House projects are so fun... especially when there's old blown-in insulation in the way... 
------------- Ten Amendments, Ten Commandments, and one Golden Rule solve most every problem. Citrus hand-cleaner with Pumice does the rest.
|